<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed;
font-size: 16px;" lang="x-western">Hi,
<br>
<br>
part of the complexity ofc also comes from putting a 2- or
3-dimensional tree into a line. Which makes me look foreward even
more for the vote-space-curtain, which falls down on demand and
has enough room to show much more of the vote-space much clearer.
(BTW, the circular layout of it is my favorite again, after we had
this thread about these centerless pipe-votes, where voters gather
around them in circles.) And I have the hope, that coding this
curtain is not so much of an effort anymore, since almost all of
the functionality of it is now already coded in the track and only
the graphics would change - or is this wrong?
<br>
<br>
But about the track:
<br>
<br>
I think, part of the confusion would go away, if there were both
names up in the track, if two people are involved in the show,
i.e. in position pages with highlighted diffs and diff-pages. And
maybe the names permanently coloured accordingly, like it is now
when hovered over (or have a colourd frame or background around
them).
<br>
<br>
And how, if we make the anchor really the center of the
user-experience? So the user always knows, where he is looking
from. From this center of his perspective he can look at other
drafters, i.e. at diffs (in position-pages and in the
diff-bridge). And ofc he can always change his center of
perspective, i.e. make another one the anchor. This would only
mean:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">We use colour for
cast relations (voter/candidate, co-voter) but the
<br>
vote track already shows that info and shows it more
intuitively.
<br>
Possible elements of a solution:
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">a) Drop colours.
Use shades of grey (light/dark) or single colour (orangish/grey)
in all places: bridge, track lighting and draft shadows.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, I think, this will help a lot. Just two stabile colours: one
for each actor: anchor and the other.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">Add colour (say
dull red) for the non-drafters, who are currently distinguished
as grey in the track. </blockquote>
<br>
If we have two colours for the others, grey for the non-drafters
is good imo.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">b) Don't
distinguish full cast relation, but only position in regard to
anchor. So voters and co-voters <b class="moz-txt-star"><span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>left<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b>
of the anchor are lightly shaded, while co-voters and candidate
<b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>right<span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> are darkly shaded. This
echoes the spatial info of the vote-track <b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>and<span
class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> emphasizes the anchor more
clearly. Easier now to orient.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Can't we leave this distinction away? Just have the anchor and the
other (no matter if left or right)?
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">The light ones
(left) remain on top in the diffs, and the dark (right) below.
No change there. </blockquote>
<br>
How, if the anchor was always on top?
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">c) Tint the user
(say blue) wherever he/she happens to appear in bridge, track
lighting and draft shadows.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Thomas
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">On Thu, 23 Aug
2012 13:28, Michael Allan wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">A quick
update. We have a couple new features on the bridge:
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://zelea.com:8080/v/w/D?a=5339&b=5340&s">http://zelea.com:8080/v/w/D?a=5339&b=5340&s</a>
<br>
<br>
(hit refresh)
<br>
<br>
The first is difference lighting. The vote track (top) now
spotlights
<br>
both authors of the difference, much like in the draft
pages. So you
<br>
can see how the authors relate to each other in local
votespace,
<br>
whether as voter and candidate, or co-voters, or what not.
<br>
<br>
The second new feature is cross-linking of differences.
Slide the
<br>
mouse along the vote track and it spotlights all of the
differences in
<br>
local votespace (again, much like in drafts). Click on one
and the
<br>
bridge link is enabled (top left). So now you can navigate
directly
<br>
from difference to difference.
<br>
<br>
Please report any bugs or other problems you see. We're
currently
<br>
testing on Firefox and Chrome.
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________
<br>
Votorola mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Votorola@zelea.com">Votorola@zelea.com</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://mail.zelea.com/mailman/listinfo/votorola">http://mail.zelea.com/mailman/listinfo/votorola</a>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>