<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed;
font-size: 16px;" lang="x-western">On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:49,
Michael Allan wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">But what I like
about this votespace design (mainly your design) is its
naturalism. It isn't ruled by administrative forms. It forces us
to add those as decorations. I think that's good. </blockquote>
<br>
Since our discussion about the nodes in the tree, which are sole
positions and no candidates (I think you called them
pipe-positions), around/behind which the voters gather ... since
then I like the circular layout again too.
<br>
And yes, I also see the use in not sorting by voter-count. And
also the use of placeholders.
<br>
<br>
Two things: in my firefox the vote track disappears partly behind
the page when scrolling down. And I must say, for me the size of
the vote-arrow is a bit confusing, since the candidates are shown
with different zoom, then their voters. I understand, that this is
because of the limited space, but maybe we could make this
graphically visible with some sort of "breaking line" in the
middle of the candidates arrows. So it looks like, as if they are
not shown in its full size. <br>
<br>
I mean this only for the one candidate furthest right. His small
arrow gets expanded drastically, and because of this I oftentimes
loose it with my eyes. BTW, it would be great, if the browsing
through this votespace would be animated, slow motion, but I
guess, that not possible atm.<br>
<br>
What do you think?
<br>
<br>
<br>
Thomas
<br>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>