<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Courier New">Hello,</font><br>
<br>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 1:54, Michael Allan wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:1329262066.FFc4640.4609@out.zelea.com"
type="cite">There's lots to comment on. I look at my dev
priorities (1 usability,<br>
2 attracting users and 3 scaling) and I guess this falls under 3;
our<br>
basic stage design allows the user to construct different
combinations<br>
of central scenes and peripheral tracks. We can therefore
accomodate<br>
the preferences of any user which is one requirement of scaling.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
In my view Conseo's ideas are also very much for 1 usability and 2
attracting users, especially the horizontal bridge-layout. I think,
for now the best would be, if we could come out with a combined
version of your two proposals, instead of two competing ones. <br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:39, conseo wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:53171950.nKkN5FKgsv@benjamin.whiletaker.homeip.net"
type="cite"> the communications feed track. I have created smilies
for that. </blockquote>
<br>
I like the smilies much more than the half-moons. It makes it clear
that it is about humans. Also the colouring is more mild to the eyes
imo. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:53171950.nKkN5FKgsv@benjamin.whiletaker.homeip.net"
type="cite">#3 has already been patched in a previous session.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
That is an interesting use-case. When would that happen? When would
you come to the bridge and see an old already matched diff? If I
think of something like a diff-history or just an old diff-link,
wouldn't it then be better to still show the different texts and
just make somehow clear that by now this has changed?<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:53171950.nKkN5FKgsv@benjamin.whiletaker.homeip.net"
type="cite">2)
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://whiletaker.homeip.net/mockups/diffbridge/8/8b.xht">http://whiletaker.homeip.net/mockups/diffbridge/8/8b.xht</a><br>
Show the footings. I have aligned them ascending, to emphasize
that it is a <br>
different dimension (orthogonal information) and also underline
the direction of votespace. <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I like the idea of including the names of the authors, i.e. the
titles of the drafts, into the layout of the footings. But all
together it looks to confusing to me atm. The ascending is not
necessary imo and it would look more like in the current vote-space
if it was horizontally. Which by the way is why I like the
horizontal bridge-layout so much: it is like a zoomed in piece of
the vote-space (and to some degree this also applies to a future
circular vote-space imo).<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:53171950.nKkN5FKgsv@benjamin.whiletaker.homeip.net"
type="cite">Parallel voters for Ed. and Bu. are left out for now
to avoid confusion. You <br>
can directly navigate to other differences by hitting the white
difference <br>
symbols on the left of Mi. and on the right of Ed. Do you think
this is handy?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I like the clickable difference symbols a lot too, but I see
problems. Some of the most important diffs will be to your
co-voters, I guess, which are missing here. And the ones to your
candidates co-voters, which are missing in Mike's version too. <br>
<br>
How, if we had one of Mikes footings atop each draft in the bridge,
i.e. two of them? This way we could navigate from within the bridge
to truly every diff of the tree. Maybe to much? <br>
<br>
Btw, co-voters can easily count up to 15 or so. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:53171950.nKkN5FKgsv@benjamin.whiletaker.homeip.net"
type="cite">3)
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://whiletaker.homeip.net/mockups/diffbridge/8/8c.xht">http://whiletaker.homeip.net/mockups/diffbridge/8/8c.xht</a><br>
Click (pin) a communication element. The toolbar icon for
communication <br>
(bubble) is highlighted and the sender of the post is shown on the
right <br>
caption. Either the communication bubble icon or the text itself
opens the <br>
original post in a new tab.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thats cool!<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:53171950.nKkN5FKgsv@benjamin.whiletaker.homeip.net"
type="cite">4)
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://whiletaker.homeip.net/mockups/diffbridge/8/8d.xht">http://whiletaker.homeip.net/mockups/diffbridge/8/8d.xht</a><br>
Ed. bridges the second difference, text and bridge-button <br>
immediately turn green and the patch operation is previewed. <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I like the preview-idea. Maybe it could get a bit more clear, that
at this point it is still just a preview and must still be accepted.
Maybe "Save preview" on top instead of "Accept selected"?<br>
The sliders look a bit confusing to my eyes. hm ...<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:53171950.nKkN5FKgsv@benjamin.whiletaker.homeip.net"
type="cite"><br>
5) <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://whiletaker.homeip.net/mockups/diffbridge/8/8e.xht">http://whiletaker.homeip.net/mockups/diffbridge/8/8e.xht</a><br>
Ed hovers the first difference and all communication items
relating to this <br>
difference are highlighted in its colour in the feed track.</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, good idea!<br>
<br>
Thomas<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>